Re: printing oid with %d

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Subject: Re: printing oid with %d
Date: 2020-07-29 05:58:15
Message-ID: 20200729055815.GD28700@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:35:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, given that it should be an unreachable case, there's likely
> no need to back-patch.

Thanks. Fixed on HEAD then.
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-07-29 06:06:58 Re: Doc patch: mention indexes in pg_inherits docs
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2020-07-29 05:16:15 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions