Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date: 2020-07-16 11:45:55
Message-ID: 20200716114409.GF8389@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:58:58AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> if test "$with_openssl" = yes ; then
> dnl Order matters!
> + AC_DEFINE(OPENSSL_API_COMPAT, [10001],
> + [Define to the OpenSSL API version in use. This avoids
> deprecation warnings from newer OpenSSL versions.])
> if test "$PORTNAME" != "win32"; then

I think that you should additionally mention the version number
directly in the description, so as when support for 1.0.1 gets removed
it is possible to grep for it, and then adjust the number and the
description.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Lepikhov 2020-07-16 11:56:54 Re: Partitioning and postgres_fdw optimisations for multi-tenancy
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-07-16 11:01:06 Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication