From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility |
Date: | 2020-07-16 11:45:55 |
Message-ID: | 20200716114409.GF8389@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:58:58AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> if test "$with_openssl" = yes ; then
> dnl Order matters!
> + AC_DEFINE(OPENSSL_API_COMPAT, [10001],
> + [Define to the OpenSSL API version in use. This avoids
> deprecation warnings from newer OpenSSL versions.])
> if test "$PORTNAME" != "win32"; then
I think that you should additionally mention the version number
directly in the description, so as when support for 1.0.1 gets removed
it is possible to grep for it, and then adjust the number and the
description.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrey Lepikhov | 2020-07-16 11:56:54 | Re: Partitioning and postgres_fdw optimisations for multi-tenancy |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-07-16 11:01:06 | Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication |