From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | james(at)yobota(dot)xyz, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Transaction Management |
Date: | 2020-07-14 20:22:59 |
Message-ID: | 20200714202259.GB17494@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:46:59AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/plpgsql-transactions.html
> Description:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are looking to use transaction management and have run into a limitation
> when the procedure is security definer. There doesn't appear to be any
> reference to this in the
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/plpgsql-transactions.html so we cannot
> see when the limitation is lifted.
>
> Are you able to clarify the situation with this between PG11, 12 and 13? We
> are hoping the limitation is lifted as we cannot see what the reason for the
> limitation is.
You are going to need to be more specific if you want help, and this
doesn't seem like a documentation problem either.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2020-07-14 21:33:07 | strange syntax |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-07-14 19:46:44 | Re: Default setting for enable_hashagg_disk |