| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Expand the use of check_canonical_path() for more GUCs |
| Date: | 2020-07-10 00:32:08 |
| Message-ID: | 20200710003208.GB11153@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 02:19:06PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Re-reading this thread it seems to me that the conclusion is to mark the patch
> Returned with Feedback in this commitfest, and possibly expand documentation or
> comments on path canonicalization in the code at some point.
>
> Does that seem fair?
Yes, that's fair as there is visibly a consensus that we could perhaps
remove some of the canonicalization, but not expand it. There is
nothing preventing to live with the current things in place either, so
done.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2020-07-10 00:35:53 | Re: Performing partition pruning using row value |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-07-10 00:22:04 | Re: Intermittent BRIN failures on hyrax and lousyjack |