From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgbf(at)twiska(dot)com, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view |
Date: | 2020-07-09 00:53:32 |
Message-ID: | 20200709005332.GA1986@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jul-08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > Ouch. So 12 builds with -O0 but 13 does not?
>
> Unless Tom's changed the animal's config since that thread, yes.
I verified the configs in branches 12 and 13 in one of the failing
animals, and yes that's still the case.
> > Did we do something to
> > sequence.c to work around this problem? I cannot find anything.
>
> We did not. If it's a compiler bug, and one as phase-of-the-moon-
> dependent as this seems to be, I'd have zero confidence that any
> specific source code change would fix it (barring someone confidently
> explaining exactly what the compiler bug is, anyway). The best we
> can do for now is hope that backing off the -O level avoids the bug.
An easy workaround might be to add -O0 for that platform in that
directory's Makefile.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2020-07-09 00:57:30 | Re: Reigning in ExecParallelHashRepartitionFirst |
Previous Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2020-07-09 00:49:21 | RE: Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? |