From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: language cleanups in code and docs |
Date: | 2020-07-08 20:39:17 |
Message-ID: | 20200708203917.zes4km6rx55uyfcx@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I've pushed most of the changes.
On 2020-06-16 18:59:25 -0400, David Steele wrote:
> On 6/16/20 6:27 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2020-06-16 17:14:57 -0400, David Steele wrote:
> > > On 6/15/20 2:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >
> > > > 0008: docs: WIP multi-master rephrasing.
> > > > I like neither the new nor the old language much. I'd welcome input.
> > >
> > > Why not multi-primary?
> >
> > My understanding of primary is that there really can't be two things
> > that are primary in relation to each other.
>
> Well, I think the same is true for multi-master and that's pretty common.
>
> > active/active is probably
> > the most common term in use besides multi-master.
>
> Works for me and can always be updated later if we come up with something
> better. At least active-active will be easier to search for.
What do you think about the attached?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-docs-use-active-active-instead-of-multi-master-repli.patch | text/x-diff | 4.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konstantin Knizhnik | 2020-07-08 20:41:01 | Postgres is not able to handle more than 4k tables!? |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2020-07-08 20:16:54 | Reigning in ExecParallelHashRepartitionFirst |