Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"
Date: 2020-07-08 13:00:47
Message-ID: 20200708130047.GE18003@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 09:46:34AM -0700, Mark Dilger wrote:
> Rebased patch attached. Thanks for mentioning it!

There are two patches on this thread v2-0001 being much smaller than
v2-0002. I have looked at 0001 for now, and, like Alvaro, this
renaming makes sense to me. Those commands work on objects that are
relkinds, except for one OBJECT_TYPE. So, let's get 0001 patch
merged. Any objections from others?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2020-07-08 13:05:25 Is this a bug in pg_current_logfile() on Windows?
Previous Message Paul Guo 2020-07-08 12:56:44 Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion)