Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view
Date: 2020-07-06 15:29:42
Message-ID: 20200706152942.GA8127@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Jul-04, Amit Kapila wrote:

> Fair enough. It would be good if we can come up with something better
> than 'distance' for this column. Some ideas safe_wal_limit,
> safe_wal_size?

Hmm, I like safe_wal_size.

I've been looking at this intermittently since late last week and I
intend to get it done in the next couple of days.

Thanks!

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2020-07-06 15:31:32 Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2020-07-06 15:28:28 Re: Ideas about a better API for postgres_fdw remote estimates