Re: [HELP] Issue with standby server using WAL archive

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Praveen Kumar K S <praveenssit(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HELP] Issue with standby server using WAL archive
Date: 2020-07-02 16:03:30
Message-ID: 20200702160330.GV3125@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Greetings,

* Praveen Kumar K S (praveenssit(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> But if you look at the output below, 00000001000000000000000D is already
> 16MB and new WAL are created. As per my understanding,
> 00000001000000000000000D should have been archived. Am I wrong here ?

Yes, you're wrong- WAL files are re-used and will always be 16MB even if
they aren't yet completed.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Praveen Kumar K S 2020-07-02 16:06:59 Re: [HELP] Issue with standby server using WAL archive
Previous Message Praveen Kumar K S 2020-07-02 16:02:15 Re: [HELP] Issue with standby server using WAL archive