Re: restore_command for postgresql streaming replication

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Brajendra Pratap Singh <singh(dot)bpratap766(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: restore_command for postgresql streaming replication
Date: 2020-07-02 15:32:52
Message-ID: 20200702153252.GR3125@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greetings,

* Brajendra Pratap Singh (singh(dot)bpratap766(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Please help us to configure the restore_command on postgresql replication
> server's recovery.conf file incase of ERROR: requested wal segment has
> already been removed on primary and when we have implemented pgbackrest on
> primary database.
>
> Primary database -
>
> archive_command = 'pgbackrest --stanza=uatodb archive-push %p'

For this, the restore_command would be:

restore_command = 'pgbackrest --stanza=uatodb archive-get %f "%p"'

When you use pgbackrest to do a restore with 'pgbackrest restore',
pgbackrest will also write the correct restore_command into the
configuration for the restored system for you.

You might want to check out the user guide:

https://pgbackrest.org/user-guide.html

(that's for v10 on Debian, there's a couple other user guides if you're
on something different that you could look at)

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-07-02 15:43:53 Re: Different results from identical matviews
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2020-07-02 15:25:13 Re: Different results from identical matviews