Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: galiev_mr(at)taximaxim(dot)ru, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value
Date: 2020-06-29 13:53:17
Message-ID: 20200629135317.GA17529@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 04:18:58PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 05:14:23PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I found a few more places that also didn't properly document this;
> > patch attached.
>
> Good catch! I am not seeing any missing spots, so this looks good to
> me. You are planning a backpatch, right?

Yes, backpatch. I found the pattern of areas needing fixes to be quite
odd. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-06-29 14:44:23 Re: reindex database
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2020-06-29 07:26:57 Re: INDEX with optional storage parameter value