| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Erik Brandsberg <erik(at)heimdalldata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | F Bax <fbax(dot)ca(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql function for roman2decimal? |
| Date: | 2020-06-27 21:31:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20200627213140.GC16643@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 05:28:51PM -0400, Erik Brandsberg wrote:
> If the core code already does one direction (I didn't know this) then I would
> agree. It seems that both would make sense to be in a separate module, due to
> the rarity of use, possibly just as an "exotic function" module, which would
> have a lower barrier of entry to adding code to.
Well, I don't think we would remove the numeric to Roman conversion
since it would break backward compatibility, and it isn't much code, so
going in the forward direction of adding a Roman to numeric conversion
would make sense in the core code.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martin Handsteiner | 2020-06-29 08:10:34 | AW: Optimizer Hint, to ignore limit and offset in optimizer plan |
| Previous Message | Erik Brandsberg | 2020-06-27 21:28:51 | Re: pgsql function for roman2decimal? |