From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Felix Lechner <felix(dot)lechner(at)lease-up(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fwd: PostgreSQL: WolfSSL support |
Date: | 2020-06-27 12:56:38 |
Message-ID: | 20200627125638.GA16644@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 02:50:27PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Peter Eisentraut
> > What would be the advantage of using wolfSSL over OpenSSL?
>
> Avoiding the OpenSSL-vs-GPL linkage problem with readline.
Uh, wolfSSL is GPL2:
https://www.wolfssl.com/license/
Not sure why we would want to lock Postgres into a GPL-style
requirement. As I understand it, we don't normally ship readline or
openssl.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2020-06-27 13:00:47 | Re: [PATCH] Remove Extra palloc Of raw_buf For Binary Format In COPY FROM |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2020-06-27 12:55:19 | Re: proposal: possibility to read dumped table's name from file |