From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Missing links between system catalog documentation pages |
Date: | 2020-06-21 15:08:02 |
Message-ID: | 20200621150802.GA1221@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jun-21, Tom Lane wrote:
> That has not been our practice up to now, eg in comparable cases in
> discussions of GUC variables, only the first reference is xref-ified.
> I think it could be kind of annoying to make every reference a link,
> both for regular readers (the link decoration is too bold in most
> browsers) and for users of screen-reader software.
In the glossary I also changed things so that only the first reference
of a term in another term's definition is linked; my experience reading
the originals as submitted (which did link them all at some point) is
that the extra links are very distracting, bad for readability. So +1
for not adding links to every single mention.
> There is a fair question as to how far apart two references should
> be before we <xref> both of them. But I think that distance
> does need to be more than zero, and probably more than one para.
Nod.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-06-21 15:16:43 | Re: <application> vs <command> for command line tools in the docs |
Previous Message | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker | 2020-06-21 14:45:29 | <application> vs <command> for command line tools in the docs |