From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari(at)ilmari(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TAP tests and symlinks on Windows |
Date: | 2020-06-13 06:00:54 |
Message-ID: | 20200613060054.GM3362@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:02:52PM +0200, Juan José Santamaría Flecha wrote:
> The first thing that comes to mind is adding an option to vcregress to
> choose whether symlinks will be tested or skipped, would that be an
> acceptable solution?
My take would be to actually enforce that as a requirement for 14~ if
that works reliably, and of course not backpatch that change as that's
clearly an improvement and not a bug fix. It would be good to check
the status of each buildfarm member first though. And I would need to
also check my own stuff to begin with..
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-06-13 06:13:07 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2020-06-13 05:23:00 | Re: Resetting spilled txn statistics in pg_stat_replication |