Re: BUG #16484: pg_regress fails with --outputdir parameter

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, r(dot)zharkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #16484: pg_regress fails with --outputdir parameter
Date: 2020-06-13 05:12:01
Message-ID: 20200613051201.GL3362@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:59:20AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> Aha, I hadn't seen that patch, but I agree it makes sense to leave it for now
> then. +1 on the attached.

Thanks. I have been through the patch once again, and applied it to
HEAD. Worth noting that we have the same number of sql/ and expected/
repositories in the tree with check-world before and after this patch
(1 extra sql/ path is generated, 4 extra ones for expected/).
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2020-06-13 05:45:34 Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2020-06-13 04:49:02 Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation