Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment

From: Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Thomas Kellerer <shammat(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Date: 2020-06-02 21:27:58
Message-ID: 20200602212758.GH22800@aart.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 11:18:52PM +0200, Thomas Kellerer wrote:
> Ron schrieb am 02.06.2020 um 20:38:
> >
> >>   PG's individual clusters are relatively lightweight, after all.
> >
> >But require a new port, and Enterprises have Processes that must be followed.
>
> I am not 100% sure, but I think you can get around that by putting pgPool or pgBouncer
> in front and make all connections through that (with a single port)
>

Hi,

That was going to be my suggestion and you can connect to local sockets
only.

Regards,
Ken

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message raf 2020-06-02 23:52:43 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2020-06-02 21:22:49 Re: Oracle vs. PostgreSQL - a comment