From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SIGSEGV from START_REPLICATION 0/XXXXXXX in XLogSendPhysical () at walsender.c:2762 |
Date: | 2020-06-02 04:24:56 |
Message-ID: | 20200602042456.GA3594@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 06:09:06PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> Yes. Conversely, if we start logical replication in a physical
> replication connection (i.g. replication=true) we got an error before
> staring replication:
>
> ERROR: logical decoding requires a database connection
>
> I think we can prevent that SEGV in a similar way.
Still unconvinced as this restriction stands for logical decoding
requiring a database connection but it is not necessarily true now as
physical replication has less restrictions than a logical one.
Looking at the code, I think that there is some confusion with the
fake WAL reader used as base reference in InitWalSender() where we
assume that it could only be used in the context of a non-database WAL
sender. However, this initialization happens when the WAL sender
connection is initialized, and what I think this misses is that we
should try to initialize a WAL reader when actually going through a
START_REPLICATION command.
I can note as well that StartLogicalReplication() moves in this sense
by setting xlogreader to be the one from logical_decoding_ctx once the
decoding context has been created.
This results in the attached. The extra test from upthread to check
that logical decoding is not allowed in a non-database WAL sender is a
good idea, so I have kept it.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
walsender-crash-v2.patch | text/x-diff | 5.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-06-02 04:49:17 | Re: Read access for pg_monitor to pg_replication_origin_status view |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2020-06-02 04:15:24 | Re: making update/delete of inheritance trees scale better |