On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 02:38:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Indeed, looks good to me. I'll go fix, ust let's wait and see first
> if others have any comments.
Actually, I was reading again the new sentence, and did not like its
first part. Here is a rework that looks much better to me:
* Load hardcoded DH parameters.
*
- * To prevent problems if the DH parameter files don't even exist, we
- * can load hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend.
+ * If DH parameters cannot be loaded from a specified file, we can load
+ * the hardcoded DH parameters supplied with the backend to prevent
+ * problems.
Daniel, is that fine for you?
--
Michael