Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations
Date: 2020-05-23 05:21:50
Message-ID: 20200523052150.GA266978@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:32:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks for the input, Robert. So, even if we are post-beta1 it looks
> like there are more upsides than downsides to get that stuff done
> sooner than later. I propose to get that applied in the next couple
> of days, please let me know if there are any objections.

Hearing nothing, done. Thanks all for the discussion.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-23 05:39:35 Re: race condition when writing pg_control
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2020-05-23 04:34:54 Re: Parallel Seq Scan vs kernel read ahead