Re: 11.7 Indexes on Expressions: editorial correction

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:32:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > The paragraph that begins "If we were to declare this index UNIQUE,..."
> > refers to the index test1_lower_col1_idx, not to the test1_uniq_int index it
> > currently follows. It would appear the latter example was spliced into the
> > middle of discussing the former.
>
> Yes, this was complained of before:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/E1ikvbp-0005jW-E9%40gemulon.postgresql.org
>
> I remain of the opinion that we'd be best off to just revert
> a9760d0f3 altogether. Bruce's last proposal mostly did that,
> but it still insisted on muddying an existing example with an
> unrelated comment.

Muddy patch applied. ;-) I am open to clarifying it but I think we
need something in our docs about this idea.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +