| From: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'? |
| Date: | 2020-05-20 13:40:35 |
| Message-ID: | 20200520134035.GD296739@msg.df7cb.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian pgsql-pkg-yum |
Re: Peter Eisentraut
> The upstream default is still to use md5 passwords by default, and some
> deliberation has gone into that to keep it that way. So it would make sense
> to have the RPMs also do that. The Debian packages also still use md5.
> Some consistency across the board would be good. Otherwise it will be very
> confusing for users if everyone just goes into their own direction.
The upstream initdb default is still 'trust', but everyone agrees that
it's good that distributions are changing that so something more
secure, so we are already disconnected from the "true" default here.
We can move the Debian packages to scram as well, if that helps.
I just haven't done that yet because I haven't read up on how a
migration plan should look.
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2020-05-20 14:13:43 | Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-05-20 13:09:24 | Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2020-05-20 14:13:43 | Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2020-05-20 13:09:24 | Re: Can we stop defaulting to 'ident'? |