Re: SyncRepLock acquired exclusively in default configuration

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Xin Zhang <xzhang(at)pivotal(dot)io>, Asim Praveen <apraveen(at)pivotal(dot)io>
Subject: Re: SyncRepLock acquired exclusively in default configuration
Date: 2020-05-20 05:38:38
Message-ID: 20200520053838.GC2355@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 08:56:13AM -0700, Ashwin Agrawal wrote:
> Sure, add it to commit fest.
> Seems though it should be backpatched to relevant branches as well.

It does not seem to be listed yet. Are you planning to add it under
the section for bug fixes?
--
Michael

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-20 05:56:50 Re: explicit_bzero for sslpassword
Previous Message Andres Freund 2020-05-20 05:10:40 Re: Problem with pg_atomic_compare_exchange_u64 at 32-bit platformwd