| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com, sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, sk(at)zsrv(dot)org, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots |
| Date: | 2020-05-19 02:43:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20200519024357.GB11835@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 07:44:59PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> BTW while you're messing with checkpointer, I propose this patch to
> simplify things.
It seems to me that this would have a benefit if we begin to have a
code path in CreateCheckpoint() where where it makes sense to let the
checkpointer know that no checkpoint has happened, and now we assume
that a skipped checkpoint is a performed one. As that's not the case
now, I would vote for keeping the code as-is.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2020-05-19 03:32:50 | Re: Missing grammar production for WITH TIES |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2020-05-19 02:41:12 | Re: SyncRepLock acquired exclusively in default configuration |