Quick Links

Re: pg_stat_wal_receiver and flushedUpto/writtenUpto

From:	Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To:	Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc:	Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject:	Re: pg_stat_wal_receiver and flushedUpto/writtenUpto
Date:	2020-05-17 01:08:57
Message-ID:	20200517010857.GI212736@paquier.xyz
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 10:15:47AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Thanks. If there are no objections, I'll revisit that tomorrow and
> apply it with those changes, just in time for beta1.

Okay, done this part then.
--
Michael

In response to

Re: pg_stat_wal_receiver and flushedUpto/writtenUpto at 2020-05-16 01:15:47 from Michael Paquier

Responses

Re: pg_stat_wal_receiver and flushedUpto/writtenUpto at 2020-05-19 14:38:52 from Fujii Masao

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Jack Christensen	2020-05-17 01:12:27	Performance penalty when requesting text values in binary format
Previous Message	Andres Freund	2020-05-17 01:00:05	Re: [HACKERS] Restricting maximum keep segments by repslots