From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Piotr Stefaniak <postgres(at)piotr-stefaniak(dot)me> |
Subject: | Re: pgindent && weirdness |
Date: | 2020-05-15 22:15:30 |
Message-ID: | 20200515221530.GA2345@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-May-16, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Here's the patch I propose to commit to pg_bsd_indent, if the repo
> lets me, and here's the result of running it on the PG tree today.
Looks good. Of all these changes in PG, only two are of the STACK_OK()
nature, and there are 38 places that get better.
> I suppose the principled way to fix that problem with STACK_OF(x)
> would be to have a user-supplied list of function-like-macros that
> expand to a type name, but I'm not planning to waste time on that.
+1 on just ignoring that problem as insignificant.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-15 22:18:34 | Re: pgindent && weirdness |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-15 22:15:03 | Re: pgindent && weirdness |