From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft |
Date: | 2020-05-12 21:16:29 |
Message-ID: | 20200512211629.GC4666@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:47:38PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > OK, I have moved her name to be first. FYI, this commit was backpatched
> > back through PG 11, though the commit message doesn't mention that.
>
> At some point I became an avid user of our src/tools/git_changelog, and
> then it stopped making sense for me to highlight in the commit message
> the fact that the commit is back-patched, since it's so obvious there.
> Maybe that's wrong and I should get back in the habit of mentioning it.
Uh, not sure. I don't need it since, as you said,
src/tools/git_changelog covers it, but someone got confused since they
looked at just the commit message without looking at
src/tools/git_changelog.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-12 21:17:09 | Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster. |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-05-12 21:15:43 | Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft |