Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Date: 2020-05-12 21:16:29
Message-ID: 20200512211629.GC4666@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 01:47:38PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-May-07, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > OK, I have moved her name to be first. FYI, this commit was backpatched
> > back through PG 11, though the commit message doesn't mention that.
>
> At some point I became an avid user of our src/tools/git_changelog, and
> then it stopped making sense for me to highlight in the commit message
> the fact that the commit is back-patched, since it's so obvious there.
> Maybe that's wrong and I should get back in the habit of mentioning it.

Uh, not sure. I don't need it since, as you said,
src/tools/git_changelog covers it, but someone got confused since they
looked at just the commit message without looking at
src/tools/git_changelog.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-05-12 21:17:09 Re: Our naming of wait events is a disaster.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2020-05-12 21:15:43 Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft