Re: Problem with logical replication

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Euler Taveira <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with logical replication
Date: 2020-05-11 07:28:52
Message-ID: 20200511072852.GE88791@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 07:08:03PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> I attached a patch with the described solution. I also included a test that
> covers this scenario.

- Assert(RelationGetReplicaIndex(rel) == RelationGetRelid(idxrel));
+ Assert(GetRelationIdentityOrPK(rel) == RelationGetRelid(idxrel));

Not much a fan of adding a routine to relcache.c to do the work of two
routines already present, so I think that we had better add an extra
condition based on RelationGetPrimaryKeyIndex, and give up on
GetRelationIdentityOrPK() in execReplication.c. Wouldn't it also be
better to cross-check the replica identity here depending on if
RelationGetReplicaIndex() returns an invalid OID or not?
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-05-11 08:13:54 Re: pg_regress cleans up tablespace twice.
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-11 06:54:02 Re: Strange decreasing value of pg_last_wal_receive_lsn()