From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |
Date: | 2020-05-09 20:18:36 |
Message-ID: | 20200509201836.GC18456@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Checking if it's possible to address this Opened Item before 13b1.
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_13_Open_Items
consistency of explain output: two spaces, equals vs colons, semicolons (incremental sort)
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 09:46:55AM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:36 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 10:53:05AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 08:40:30AM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> > > > > And, should it use two spaces before "Sort Method", "Memory" and "Pre-sorted
> > > ...
> > > > I read through that subthread, and the ending seemed to be Peter
> > > > wanting things to be unified. Was there a conclusion beyond that?
> > >
> > > This discussion is ongoing. I think let's wait until that's settled before
> > > addressing this more complex and even newer case. We can add "explain, two
> > > spaces and equals vs colon" to the "Open items" list if need be - I hope the
> > > discussion will not delay the release.
> >
> > The change proposed on the WAL thread is minimal, and makes new explain(WAL)
> > output consistent with the that of explain(BUFFERS).
> >
> > That uses a different format from "Sort", which is what incremental sort should
> > follow. (Hashjoin also uses the Sort's format of two-spaces and colons rather
> > than equals).
>
> I think it's not great that buffers/sort are different, but I agree
> that we should follow sort.
>
> > So the attached 0001 makes explain output for incremental sort more consistent
> > with sort:
> >
> > - Two spaces;
> > - colons rather than equals;
> > - Don't use semicolon, which isn't in use anywhere else;
> >
> > I tested with this:
> > template1=# DROP TABLE t; CREATE TABLE t(i int, j int); INSERT INTO t SELECT a-(a%100), a%1000 FROM generate_series(1,99999)a; CREATE INDEX ON t(i); VACUUM VERBOSE ANALYZE t;
> > template1=# explain analyze SELECT * FROM t a ORDER BY i,j;
> > ...
> > Full-sort Groups: 1000 Sort Method: quicksort Average Memory: 28kB Peak Memory: 28kB Pre-sorted Groups: 1000 Sort Method: quicksort Average Memory: 30kB Peak Memory: 30kB
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 05:34:15PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 08:40:30AM -0400, James Coleman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 12:25 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > > Should "Pre-sorted Groups:" be on a separate line ?
> > > > > | Full-sort Groups: 1 Sort Method: quicksort Memory: avg=28kB peak=28kB Pre-sorted Groups: 1 Sort Method: quicksort Memory: avg=30kB peak=30kB
> > > >
> > > > I'd originally had that, but Tomas wanted it to be more compact. It's
> > > > easy to adjust though if the consensus changes on that.
> > >
> > > I'm OK with changing the format if there's a consensus. The current
> > > format seemed better to me, but I'm not particularly attached to it.
> >
> > I still think Pre-sorted groups should be on a separate line, as in 0002.
> > In addition to looking better (to me), and being easier to read, another reason
> > is that there are essentially key=>values here, but the keys are repeated (Sort
> > Method, etc).
>
> I collapsed this into 0001 because I think that if we're going to do
> away with the key=value style then we effectively to have to do this
> to avoid the repeated values being confusing (with key=value it kinda
> worked, because that made it seem like the avg/peak were clearly a
> subset of the Sort Groups info).
>
> I also cleaned up the newline patch a bit in the process (we already
> have a way to indent with a flag so don't need to do it directly).
>
> > I also suggested to rename: s/Presorted/Pre-sorted/, but I didn't do that here.
>
> I went ahead and did that too; we already use "Full-sort", so the
> proposed change makes both parallel.
>
> > Michael already patched most of the comment typos, the remainder I'm including
> > here as a "nearby patch"..
>
> Modified slightly.
>
> James
> From becd60ba348558fa241db5cc2100a84b757cbdc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Justin Pryzby <pryzbyj(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
> Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 17:37:31 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] comment typos: Incremental Sort
>
> commit d2d8a229bc58a2014dce1c7a4fcdb6c5ab9fb8da
> Author: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)postgresql(dot)org>
>
> Previously reported here:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200407042521.GH2228%40telsasoft.com
> ---
> src/backend/commands/explain.c | 4 ++--
> src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c | 10 ++++++----
> src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c | 8 ++++----
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/commands/explain.c b/src/backend/commands/explain.c
> index 5f91c569a0..86c10458f4 100644
> --- a/src/backend/commands/explain.c
> +++ b/src/backend/commands/explain.c
> @@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ show_incremental_sort_group_info(IncrementalSortGroupInfo *groupInfo,
> }
>
> /*
> - * If it's EXPLAIN ANALYZE, show tuplesort stats for a incremental sort node
> + * If it's EXPLAIN ANALYZE, show tuplesort stats for an incremental sort node
> */
> static void
> show_incremental_sort_info(IncrementalSortState *incrsortstate,
> @@ -2913,7 +2913,7 @@ show_incremental_sort_info(IncrementalSortState *incrsortstate,
> &incrsortstate->shared_info->sinfo[n];
>
> /*
> - * If a worker hasn't process any sort groups at all, then exclude
> + * If a worker hasn't processed any sort groups at all, then exclude
> * it from output since it either didn't launch or didn't
> * contribute anything meaningful.
> */
> diff --git a/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c b/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c
> index 39ba11cdf7..05c60ec3e0 100644
> --- a/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c
> +++ b/src/backend/executor/nodeIncrementalSort.c
> @@ -987,8 +987,8 @@ ExecInitIncrementalSort(IncrementalSort *node, EState *estate, int eflags)
>
> /*
> * Incremental sort can't be used with either EXEC_FLAG_REWIND,
> - * EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD or EXEC_FLAG_MARK, because we only one of many sort
> - * batches in the current sort state.
> + * EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD or EXEC_FLAG_MARK, because the current sort state
> + * contains only one sort batch rather than the full result set.
> */
> Assert((eflags & (EXEC_FLAG_BACKWARD |
> EXEC_FLAG_MARK)) == 0);
> @@ -1153,8 +1153,10 @@ ExecReScanIncrementalSort(IncrementalSortState *node)
> /*
> * If we've set up either of the sort states yet, we need to reset them.
> * We could end them and null out the pointers, but there's no reason to
> - * repay the setup cost, and because guard setting up pivot comparator
> - * state similarly, doing so might actually cause a leak.
> + * repay the setup cost, and because ExecIncrementalSort guards
> + * presorted column functions by checking to see if the full sort state
> + * has been initialized yet, setting the sort states to null here might
> + * actually cause a leak.
> */
> if (node->fullsort_state != NULL)
> {
> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c b/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c
> index de38c6c7e0..d59e3d5a8d 100644
> --- a/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c
> +++ b/src/backend/utils/sort/tuplesort.c
> @@ -1428,11 +1428,11 @@ tuplesort_updatemax(Tuplesortstate *state)
> }
>
> /*
> - * Sort evicts data to the disk when it didn't manage to fit those data to
> - * the main memory. This is why we assume space used on the disk to be
> + * Sort evicts data to the disk when it wasn't able to fit that data into
> + * main memory. This is why we assume space used on the disk to be
> * more important for tracking resource usage than space used in memory.
> - * Note that amount of space occupied by some tuple set on the disk might
> - * be less than amount of space occupied by the same tuple set in the
> + * Note that the amount of space occupied by some tupleset on the disk might
> + * be less than amount of space occupied by the same tupleset in
> * memory due to more compact representation.
> */
> if ((isSpaceDisk && !state->isMaxSpaceDisk) ||
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> From 8e80be2b345c3940f76ffbd5e3c201a7ae855784 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Justin Pryzby <pryzbyj(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 08:45:21 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] Fix explain output for incr sort:
>
> - Two spaces
> - colons rather than equals
> - Don't use semicolon
> - Put Pre-sorted groups on a separate line
> - Rename Presorted to Pre-sorted (to match Full-sort)
> ---
> src/backend/commands/explain.c | 22 ++++++++-----------
> .../regress/expected/incremental_sort.out | 21 +++++++++---------
> src/test/regress/sql/incremental_sort.sql | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/commands/explain.c b/src/backend/commands/explain.c
> index 7ae6131676..5f91c569a0 100644
> --- a/src/backend/commands/explain.c
> +++ b/src/backend/commands/explain.c
> @@ -2778,7 +2778,7 @@ show_incremental_sort_group_info(IncrementalSortGroupInfo *groupInfo,
> {
> if (indent)
> appendStringInfoSpaces(es->str, es->indent * 2);
> - appendStringInfo(es->str, "%s Groups: " INT64_FORMAT " Sort Method", groupLabel,
> + appendStringInfo(es->str, "%s Groups: " INT64_FORMAT " Sort Method", groupLabel,
> groupInfo->groupCount);
> /* plural/singular based on methodNames size */
> if (list_length(methodNames) > 1)
> @@ -2798,24 +2798,20 @@ show_incremental_sort_group_info(IncrementalSortGroupInfo *groupInfo,
> const char *spaceTypeName;
>
> spaceTypeName = tuplesort_space_type_name(SORT_SPACE_TYPE_MEMORY);
> - appendStringInfo(es->str, " %s: avg=%ldkB peak=%ldkB",
> + appendStringInfo(es->str, " Average %s: %ldkB Peak %s: %ldkB",
> spaceTypeName, avgSpace,
> - groupInfo->maxMemorySpaceUsed);
> + spaceTypeName, groupInfo->maxMemorySpaceUsed);
> }
>
> if (groupInfo->maxDiskSpaceUsed > 0)
> {
> long avgSpace = groupInfo->totalDiskSpaceUsed / groupInfo->groupCount;
> -
> const char *spaceTypeName;
>
> spaceTypeName = tuplesort_space_type_name(SORT_SPACE_TYPE_DISK);
> - /* Add a semicolon separator only if memory stats were printed. */
> - if (groupInfo->maxMemorySpaceUsed > 0)
> - appendStringInfo(es->str, ";");
> - appendStringInfo(es->str, " %s: avg=%ldkB peak=%ldkB",
> + appendStringInfo(es->str, " Average %s: %ldkB Peak %s: %ldkB",
> spaceTypeName, avgSpace,
> - groupInfo->maxDiskSpaceUsed);
> + spaceTypeName, groupInfo->maxDiskSpaceUsed);
> }
> }
> else
> @@ -2899,8 +2895,8 @@ show_incremental_sort_info(IncrementalSortState *incrsortstate,
> if (prefixsortGroupInfo->groupCount > 0)
> {
> if (es->format == EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT)
> - appendStringInfo(es->str, " ");
> - show_incremental_sort_group_info(prefixsortGroupInfo, "Presorted", false, es);
> + appendStringInfo(es->str, "\n");
> + show_incremental_sort_group_info(prefixsortGroupInfo, "Pre-sorted", true, es);
> }
> if (es->format == EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT)
> appendStringInfo(es->str, "\n");
> @@ -2943,8 +2939,8 @@ show_incremental_sort_info(IncrementalSortState *incrsortstate,
> if (prefixsortGroupInfo->groupCount > 0)
> {
> if (es->format == EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT)
> - appendStringInfo(es->str, " ");
> - show_incremental_sort_group_info(prefixsortGroupInfo, "Presorted", false, es);
> + appendStringInfo(es->str, "\n");
> + show_incremental_sort_group_info(prefixsortGroupInfo, "Pre-sorted", true, es);
> }
> if (es->format == EXPLAIN_FORMAT_TEXT)
> appendStringInfo(es->str, "\n");
> diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/incremental_sort.out b/src/test/regress/expected/incremental_sort.out
> index 238d89a206..2b40a26d82 100644
> --- a/src/test/regress/expected/incremental_sort.out
> +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/incremental_sort.out
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ declare
> space_key text;
> begin
> for node in select * from jsonb_array_elements(explain_analyze_inc_sort_nodes(query)) t loop
> - for group_key in select unnest(array['Full-sort Groups', 'Presorted Groups']::text[]) t loop
> + for group_key in select unnest(array['Full-sort Groups', 'Pre-sorted Groups']::text[]) t loop
> for space_key in select unnest(array['Sort Space Memory', 'Sort Space Disk']::text[]) t loop
> node := jsonb_set(node, array[group_key, space_key, 'Average Sort Space Used'], '"NN"', false);
> node := jsonb_set(node, array[group_key, space_key, 'Peak Sort Space Used'], '"NN"', false);
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ declare
> space_key text;
> begin
> for node in select * from jsonb_array_elements(explain_analyze_inc_sort_nodes(query)) t loop
> - for group_key in select unnest(array['Full-sort Groups', 'Presorted Groups']::text[]) t loop
> + for group_key in select unnest(array['Full-sort Groups', 'Pre-sorted Groups']::text[]) t loop
> group_stats := node->group_key;
> for space_key in select unnest(array['Sort Space Memory', 'Sort Space Disk']::text[]) t loop
> if (group_stats->space_key->'Peak Sort Space Used')::bigint < (group_stats->space_key->'Peak Sort Space Used')::bigint then
> @@ -533,13 +533,13 @@ select * from (select * from t order by a) s order by a, b limit 55;
>
> -- Test EXPLAIN ANALYZE with only a fullsort group.
> select explain_analyze_without_memory('select * from (select * from t order by a) s order by a, b limit 55');
> - explain_analyze_without_memory
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + explain_analyze_without_memory
> +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Limit (actual rows=55 loops=1)
> -> Incremental Sort (actual rows=55 loops=1)
> Sort Key: t.a, t.b
> Presorted Key: t.a
> - Full-sort Groups: 2 Sort Methods: top-N heapsort, quicksort Memory: avg=NNkB peak=NNkB
> + Full-sort Groups: 2 Sort Methods: top-N heapsort, quicksort Average Memory: NNkB Peak Memory: NNkB
> -> Sort (actual rows=101 loops=1)
> Sort Key: t.a
> Sort Method: quicksort Memory: NNkB
> @@ -708,18 +708,19 @@ select * from t left join (select * from (select * from t order by a) v order by
> rollback;
> -- Test EXPLAIN ANALYZE with both fullsort and presorted groups.
> select explain_analyze_without_memory('select * from (select * from t order by a) s order by a, b limit 70');
> - explain_analyze_without_memory
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> + explain_analyze_without_memory
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Limit (actual rows=70 loops=1)
> -> Incremental Sort (actual rows=70 loops=1)
> Sort Key: t.a, t.b
> Presorted Key: t.a
> - Full-sort Groups: 1 Sort Method: quicksort Memory: avg=NNkB peak=NNkB Presorted Groups: 5 Sort Methods: top-N heapsort, quicksort Memory: avg=NNkB peak=NNkB
> + Full-sort Groups: 1 Sort Method: quicksort Average Memory: NNkB Peak Memory: NNkB
> + Pre-sorted Groups: 5 Sort Methods: top-N heapsort, quicksort Average Memory: NNkB Peak Memory: NNkB
> -> Sort (actual rows=1000 loops=1)
> Sort Key: t.a
> Sort Method: quicksort Memory: NNkB
> -> Seq Scan on t (actual rows=1000 loops=1)
> -(9 rows)
> +(10 rows)
>
> select jsonb_pretty(explain_analyze_inc_sort_nodes_without_memory('select * from (select * from t order by a) s order by a, b limit 70'));
> jsonb_pretty
> @@ -747,7 +748,7 @@ select jsonb_pretty(explain_analyze_inc_sort_nodes_without_memory('select * from
> "Average Sort Space Used": "NN"+
> } +
> }, +
> - "Presorted Groups": { +
> + "Pre-sorted Groups": { +
> "Group Count": 5, +
> "Sort Methods Used": [ +
> "top-N heapsort", +
> diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/incremental_sort.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/incremental_sort.sql
> index 2241cc9c02..6f70b36a81 100644
> --- a/src/test/regress/sql/incremental_sort.sql
> +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/incremental_sort.sql
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ declare
> space_key text;
> begin
> for node in select * from jsonb_array_elements(explain_analyze_inc_sort_nodes(query)) t loop
> - for group_key in select unnest(array['Full-sort Groups', 'Presorted Groups']::text[]) t loop
> + for group_key in select unnest(array['Full-sort Groups', 'Pre-sorted Groups']::text[]) t loop
> for space_key in select unnest(array['Sort Space Memory', 'Sort Space Disk']::text[]) t loop
> node := jsonb_set(node, array[group_key, space_key, 'Average Sort Space Used'], '"NN"', false);
> node := jsonb_set(node, array[group_key, space_key, 'Peak Sort Space Used'], '"NN"', false);
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ declare
> space_key text;
> begin
> for node in select * from jsonb_array_elements(explain_analyze_inc_sort_nodes(query)) t loop
> - for group_key in select unnest(array['Full-sort Groups', 'Presorted Groups']::text[]) t loop
> + for group_key in select unnest(array['Full-sort Groups', 'Pre-sorted Groups']::text[]) t loop
> group_stats := node->group_key;
> for space_key in select unnest(array['Sort Space Memory', 'Sort Space Disk']::text[]) t loop
> if (group_stats->space_key->'Peak Sort Space Used')::bigint < (group_stats->space_key->'Peak Sort Space Used')::bigint then
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Justin Pryzby
System Administrator
Telsasoft
+1-952-707-8581
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-05-09 20:48:17 | Re: [PATCH] Fix division by zero (explain.c) |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-05-09 18:43:54 | Re: Add -Wold-style-definition to CFLAGS? |