| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | AC Gomez <antklc(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New Role drop with Grant/Revokes stop working after subsequent runs |
| Date: | 2020-05-07 15:16:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20200507151609.GC13712@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greetings,
* David G. Johnston (david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:05 PM AC Gomez <antklc(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I suppose the main question is, why would a bunch of grant and revoke
> > commands run and not do anything, not even throw an error?
>
> Maybe its a bug? - I doubt this kind of manipulation is all that common or
> tested given the presence of what seems to be a superior alternative.
Didn't read through the rest of this, but for this part- the SQL spec
has some rather odd requirements when it comes to GRANT/REVOKEs and what
happens if no GRANT or REVOKE is able to be performed (like: don't throw
an error).
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-05-07 15:46:51 | Re: Explain plan changes - IN CLAUSE ( Passing direct values Vs INNER Query ) |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-05-07 15:14:24 | Re: Lock Postgres account after X number of failed logins? |