| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft |
| Date: | 2020-05-07 14:12:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20200507141204.GL3649@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 09:49:49AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, I have moved her name to be first. FYI, this commit was backpatched
> > back through PG 11, though the commit message doesn't mention that.
>
> If it was back-patched, it should not be appearing in the v13 release
> notes at all, surely?
Well, her name was there already for a later commit that was not
backpatched, so I just moved her name earlier. The fact that her name
was moved earlier because of something that was backpatched is
inconsistent, but I don't know enough about the work that went into the
item to comment on that. I will need someone to tell me, of the commits
that only appear in PG 13, what should be the name order.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2020-05-07 14:30:40 | Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-05-07 13:52:08 | Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft |