Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should smgrdounlink() be removed?
Date: 2020-05-07 11:33:27
Message-ID: 20200507113327.GF11539@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:57:00PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/05/07 13:49, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:48:35AM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
>> > I could not find any code reference to smgrdounlink, I feel it can be
>> > removed.
>>
>> The last use of smgrdounlink() was b416691. I have just looked at
>> Debian Code Search and github, and could not find a hit with the
>> function being used in some custom extension code, so it feels like a
>> safe bet to remove it.
>
> +1

So this gives the attached. Any thoughts?
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
smgrunlink-remove-v1.patch text/x-diff 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message دار الآثار للنشر والتوزيع-صنعاء Dar Alathar-Yemen 2020-05-07 11:48:40 رد: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function
Previous Message Ranier Vilela 2020-05-07 11:32:13 Re: Postgres Windows build system doesn't work with python installed in Program Files