| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Roles for pg_basebackup |
| Date: | 2020-05-03 06:53:31 |
| Message-ID: | 20200503065331.GB471944@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:29:09PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On 2020/04/28 17:15, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> That does make sense. I've updated the places where I think a user configuring
>> the system might conceivably infer a preference from the order, but have left
>> the other ones as is.
Yeah, I spotted a couple of places in adminpack.sgml, dropuser.sgml,
catalogs.sgml and config.sgml, but the intention looks different. We
could always discuss more on that later on.
> Thanks for updating the patch! It looks good to me.
Fine for me as well as far as it goes. I'll go apply it if there are
no objections.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2020-05-04 15:23:18 | Documentation - chapter 52, system catalogs |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-05-01 03:29:09 | Re: Roles for pg_basebackup |