From: | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery |
Date: | 2020-04-23 16:59:53 |
Message-ID: | 20200423185953.5f8e5b8f@firost |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:05:46 +0900 (JST)
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> FWIW, the test for 10- looks fine, but I have one qustion.
>
> + 'archive success reported in pg_stat_archiver for WAL segment
> $segment_name_
>
> This seems intending to show an actual segment name in the message,
> but it is really shown as "... WAL segment $segment_name_1". Is that
> intended?
Good catch. Fixed in v11. Thank you.
> At Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:46:18 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote in
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 06:17:17PM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
> > wrote:
> > > I found an extra useless line of code in v9 patch. Please, find in
> > > attachment v10. Sorry for this.
> >
> > Thanks for helping here, your changes make sense. This looks mostly
> > fine to me except that part:
> > +$standby1->poll_query_until('postgres',
> > + qq{ SELECT pg_xlog_location_diff('$primary_lsn',
> > pg_last_xlog_replay_location()) = 0 })
> > + or die "Timed out while waiting for xlog replay";
> > Here we should check if $primary_lsn is at least
> > pg_last_xlog_replay_location(). Checking for an equality may stuck
> > the test if more WAL gets replayed. For example you could have a
> > concurrent autovacuum generating WAL.
>
> Autovacuum is turned off in this case, but anyway other kinds of WAL
> records can be generated.
make sense. Fixed in v11.
Please, find in v11 for version 9.5, 9.6 and 10.
Regards,
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-v11-Fix-WAL-retention-during-production-crash-recovery-10.patch | text/x-patch | 16.9 KB |
0001-v11-Fix-WAL-retention-during-production-crash-recovery-95.patch | text/x-patch | 17.0 KB |
0001-v11-Fix-WAL-retention-during-production-crash-recovery-96.patch | text/x-patch | 16.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-04-23 23:54:02 | Re: [BUG] non archived WAL removed during production crash recovery |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2020-04-23 16:04:24 | BUG #16385: Postgres YUM repo broke |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-04-23 17:43:43 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-23 16:43:27 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |