From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables |
Date: | 2020-04-19 20:38:15 |
Message-ID: | 20200419203815.GA825@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Apr-19, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> It's probably rare that we'd be inserting into a table old enough to be
> detached, and normally that would be ok, but if a trigger were missing, it
> would misbehave. In our use-case, we're creating trigger on the parent as a
> convenient way to maintain them on the partitions, which doesn't work if a
> table exists but detached..
>
> So we'd actually prefer the behavior of indexes/constraints, where the trigger
> is preserved if the child is detached. I'm not requesting to do that just for
> our use case, which may be atypical or not a good model, but adding our one
> data point.
I think the easiest way to implement this is to have two triggers -- the
one that's direct in the partition checks whether the table is a
partition and does nothing in that case.
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Pryzby | 2020-04-19 20:49:12 | Re: DETACH PARTITION and FOR EACH ROW triggers on partitioned tables |
Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2020-04-19 20:29:52 | Re: [PATCH] Small optimization across postgres (remove strlen duplicate usage) |