| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zhang, Jie" <zhangjie2(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATHC] Fix minor memory leak in pg_basebackup |
| Date: | 2020-04-16 06:30:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20200416063036.GC81957@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:06:52AM +0000, Zhang, Jie wrote:
> In some cases , PGresult is not cleared.
>
> File: src\bin\pg_basebackup\streamutil.c
>
> bool
> RetrieveWalSegSize(PGconn *conn)
> {
> PGresult *res;
RetrieveWalSegSize() gets called only once at the beginning of
pg_basebackup and pg_receivewal, so that's not an issue that has major
effects, still that's an issue. The first one PQclear() is needed
where you say. Now for the second one, I would just move it once the
code is done with the query result, aka after calling PQgetvalue().
What do you think? Please see the attached.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| basebackup-leak.patch | text/x-diff | 695 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Khandekar | 2020-04-16 07:18:18 | Re: spin_delay() for ARM |
| Previous Message | Pierre Giraud | 2020-04-16 06:26:54 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |