| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, david(at)pgmasters(dot)net, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 |
| Date: | 2020-04-16 05:23:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20200416052305.GB1692@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 08:09:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 07:04:20PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> I agree, I think forcing users to specify --no-manifest when run on old
>>> servers will cause users to write bad scripts; I vote for silently
>>> disabling checksums.
>
>> Okay, thanks. Are there any other opinions?
>
> FWIW, I concur with silently disabling the feature if the source
> server can't support it.
Thanks. I have applied the patch, then.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2020-04-16 05:23:36 | Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server? |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2020-04-16 05:18:51 | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |