From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors |
Date: | 2020-04-13 20:00:25 |
Message-ID: | 20200413200025.3rnw7r5ssbsqntvv@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-04-11 10:54:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > How about a compile-time option to turn all the warnings in resowner.c
> > into errors? This could be enabled automatically by --enable-cassert,
> > similar to other defines that that option enables.
>
> [ itch... ] Those calls occur post-commit; throwing an error there
> is really a mess, which is why it's only WARNING now.
> I guess you could make them PANICs, but it would be an option that nobody
> could possibly want to have enabled in anything resembling production.
> So I"m kind of -0.5 on making --enable-cassert do it automatically.
> Although I suppose that it's not really worse than other assertion
> failures.
I'd much rather see this throw an assertion than the current
behaviour. But I'm wondering if there's a chance we can throw an error
in non-assert builds without adding too much complexity to the error
paths. Could we perhaps throw the error a bit later during the commit
processing?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2020-04-13 20:10:20 | Re: documenting the backup manifest file format |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2020-04-13 19:51:14 | Re: documenting the backup manifest file format |