From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: doc review for parallel vacuum |
Date: | 2020-04-13 08:30:15 |
Message-ID: | 20200413083015.GQ2228@telsasoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:44:42AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:16 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Also, this part still doesn't read well:
> >
> > - * amvacuumcleanup to the DSM segment if it's the first time to get it?
> > - * from them? because they? allocate it locally and it's possible that an
> > - * index will be vacuumed by the different vacuum process at the next
> >
> > If you change "it" and "them" and "it" and say "*a* different", then it'll be
> > ok.
> >
>
> I am not sure if I follow how exactly you want to change it but still
> let me know what you think about if we change it like: "Copy the index
> bulk-deletion result returned from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup to
> the DSM segment if it's the first time because they allocate locally
> and it's possible that an index will be vacuumed by the different
> vacuum process at the next time."
I changed "the" to "a" and removed "at":
|Copy the index
|bulk-deletion result returned from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup to
|the DSM segment if it's the first time [???] because they allocate locally
|and it's possible that an index will be vacuumed by a different
|vacuum process the next time."
Is it correct to say: "..if it's the first iteration" and "different process on
the next iteration" ? Or "cycle" ?
--
Justin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tushar | 2020-04-13 08:37:14 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |
Previous Message | 曾文旌 | 2020-04-13 08:27:59 | Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables |