| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? |
| Date: | 2020-04-12 19:39:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20200412193912.2dty2r66wvc57ahm@alap3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-04-12 11:21:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> We could also have an alternate name, like pgsql, and make 'pg' a
> symlink to it that packagers can choose to omit.
We could even name the non-abbreviated binary postgres :).
Sure, that'd cause a bit more trouble upgrading for people that scripted
starting postgres without going through pg_ctl or such, but OTOH it'd
not cause new naming conflicts. And all that'd be needed to fix the
start script would be 's/postgres/postgres server/'.
- Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-04-12 20:07:15 | Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-04-12 19:32:51 | Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? |