Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hironobu SUZUKI <hironobu(at)interdb(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function
Date: 2020-04-02 07:01:56
Message-ID: 20200402070156.GA16377@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-Apr-02, Fabien COELHO wrote:

> > I'm planning to mark this patch RwF on April 8 and I suggest you
> > resubmit if you are able to get some consensus.
>
> People interested in non-uniform benchmarks would see the point. Why many
> people would be happy with uniform benchmarks only while life is not uniform
> at all fails me.

I don't think we should boot this patch. I don't think I would be able
to get this over the commit line in this CF, but let's not discard it.

--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-04-02 07:12:11 Re: Some problems of recovery conflict wait events
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-04-02 06:54:16 Re: Some problems of recovery conflict wait events