| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: dummy commit |
| Date: | 2020-03-31 21:37:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20200331213724.GG17676@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 05:34:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > dummy commit
>
> Uh, what?
>
> Also, I disagree with your change of the wording about savepoint
> rollbacks. I agree that "if the savepoint is rolled back to"
> is a bit awkward, but I think dropping the "to" is flat wrong.
> The savepoint is a point you roll back to, it doesn't itself
> disappear when you do so. That's why the SQL syntax is
> "ROLLBACK TO savepoint" and not just "ROLLBACK savepoint".
OK, I will re-add the "to".
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2020-03-31 21:39:35 | pgsql: Add CREATE INDEX deduplication assertions. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-03-31 21:34:50 | Re: pgsql: dummy commit |