On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:48:51PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2020-Mar-30, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It looks to me like there's a similar hazard a bit further down
>> (line 3029):
>>
>> appendConnStrVal(&connstr, PQdb(o_conn));
>>
>> I wonder if we should force reuse_previous to false if there's
>> no o_conn, rather than fixing this stuff piecemeal.
>
> That was my impression too.
Good point. What do you think about the attached then?
--
Michael