Re: Internal key management system

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Moon, Insung" <tsukiwamoon(dot)pgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Cary Huang <cary(dot)huang(at)highgo(dot)ca>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope(at)jackdb(dot)com>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Internal key management system
Date: 2020-03-24 14:15:21
Message-ID: 20200324141521.GA4828@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 02:29:57PM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> That seems to work fine.
>
> So we will have pg_cryptokeys within PGDATA and each key is stored
> into separate file named the key id such as "sql", "tde-wal" and
> "tde-block". I'll update the patch and post.

Yes, that makes sense to me.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2020-03-24 14:20:25 Re: error context for vacuum to include block number
Previous Message Jürgen Purtz 2020-03-24 14:07:01 Re: documentation pdf build fail (HEAD)