| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dave Hughes <dhughes20(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Passwordcheck configuration |
| Date: | 2020-03-23 04:57:23 |
| Message-ID: | 20200323045723.GC2900@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:19:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> passwordcheck hasn't got any out-of-the-box configurability. It's mainly
> meant as sample code that people could modify if they have a mind to.
Here is an example:
https://github.com/michaelpq/pg_plugins/tree/master/passwordcheck_extra
> (I seem to recall some recent discussion about deprecating/removing
> passwordcheck altogether, but I can't find it right now.)
This was mentioned last here if I recall correctly:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/AC785D69-41EC-4D0A-AC37-1F9FF55C9E34@amazon.com
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sonam Sharma | 2020-03-23 05:36:32 | Postgres cluster setup |
| Previous Message | pabloa98 | 2020-03-23 03:55:43 | Re: Could postgres12 support millions of sequences? (like 10 million) |