| From: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ronnie S <ronniesan967(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Partition Pruning (Hash Partitions) Support for DELETEs in PostgreSQL 11 and 12 |
| Date: | 2020-03-23 04:10:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20200323041041.GH2563@telsasoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 11:45:53PM -0400, Ronnie S wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> While doing some tests with hash partitioning behavior in PG11 and 12, I
> have found that PG11 is not performing partition pruning with DELETEs
> (explain analyze returned >2000 lines). I then ran the same test in PG12
> and recreated the objects using the same DDL, and it worked
> Is this a bug, somewhat related to MergeAppend?
> https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/5220bb7533f9891b1e071da6461d5c387e8f7b09
> If it is, anyone know if we have a workaround for DELETEs to use hash
> partitions in PG11?
I think due to this commit to pg12:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/22/1778/
https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=428b260f87e8861ba8e58807b69d433db491c4f4
...
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5c83dbca-12b5-1acf-0e85-58299e464a26%40lab.ntt.co.jp
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4f049572-9440-3c99-afa1-f7ca7f38fe80%40lab.ntt.co.jp
--
Justin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | daya airody | 2020-03-23 07:40:19 | Re: JOIN on partitions is very slow |
| Previous Message | Ronnie S | 2020-03-23 03:45:53 | Partition Pruning (Hash Partitions) Support for DELETEs in PostgreSQL 11 and 12 |