Re: color by default

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo(dot)santamaria(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: color by default
Date: 2020-03-21 03:22:07
Message-ID: 20200321032207.GE10066@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:15:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> I can confirm there is still no mention of PG_COLORS in our
> >> documentation.
>
> > My mistake, PG_COLOR (not PG_COLORS) is documented properly.
>
> Yeah, but the point is precisely that pg_logging_init()
> also responds to PG_COLORS, which is not documented anywhere.

Oh, I thought it was a typo. OK, so it still an open item.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2020-03-21 03:45:31 Re: Add A Glossary
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-21 03:15:07 Re: color by default