| From: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kirill Bychik <kirill(dot)bychik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: WAL usage calculation patch |
| Date: | 2020-03-18 19:24:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20200318192400.GB69354@nol |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0300, Kirill Bychik wrote:
> > I'm attaching a v5 with fp records only for temp tables, so there's no risk of
> > instability. As I previously said I'm fine with your two patches, so unless
> > you have objections on the fpi test for temp tables or the documentation
> > changes, I believe those should be ready for committer.
>
> No objections on my side either. Thank you for your review, time and efforts!
Great, thanks also for the patches and efforts! I'll mark the entry as RFC.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-03-18 19:31:28 | Re: Additional improvements to extended statistics |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-03-18 18:45:42 | Re: potential stuck lock in SaveSlotToPath() |