From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com, tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru, ah(at)cybertec(dot)at, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: shared-memory based stats collector |
Date: | 2020-03-13 17:09:00 |
Message-ID: | 20200313170900.oudqri2wlj5ok4q7@alap3.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2020-03-13 16:34:50 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> Thank you very much!!
>
> At Thu, 12 Mar 2020 20:13:24 -0700, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote in
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thomas, could you look at the first two patches here, and my review
> > questions?
> >
> >
> > General comments about this series:
> > - A lot of the review comments feel like I've written them before, a
> > year or more ago. I feel this patch ought to be in a much better
> > state. There's a lot of IMO fairly obvious stuff here, and things that
> > have been mentioned multiple times previously.
>
> I apologize for all of the obvious stuff or things that have been
> mentioned.. I'll address them.
>
> > - There's a *lot* of typos in here. I realize being an ESL is hard, but
> > a lot of these can be found with the simplest spellchecker. That's
> > one thing for a patch that just has been hacked up as a POC, but this
> > is a multi year thread?
>
> I'll review all changed part again. I used ispell but I should have
> failed to check much of the changes.
>
> > - There's some odd formatting. Consider using pgindent more regularly.
>
> I'll do so.
>
> > More detailed comments below.
>
> Thank you very much for the intensive review, I'm going to revise the
> patch according to them.
>
> > I'm considering rewriting the parts of the patchset that I don't like -
> > but it'll look quite different afterwards.
I take your response to mean that you'd prefer to evolve the patch
largely on your own? I'm mainly asking because I think there's some
chance that we could till get this into v13, but if so we'll have to go
for it now.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2020-03-13 17:15:46 | Re: explain HashAggregate to report bucket and memory stats |
Previous Message | James Coleman | 2020-03-13 17:06:33 | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |