Re: [PATCH] Skip llvm bytecode generation if LLVM is missing

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(dot)taveira(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip llvm bytecode generation if LLVM is missing
Date: 2020-03-13 07:04:50
Message-ID: 20200313070450.d7svkh4elthxayxy@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-03-13 14:08:12 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> The alternative would be to detect a missing clang and emit a much more
> informative error than the current one that explicitly suggests retrying
> with
>
> make with_llvm=no
>
> or setting with_llvm=no in the environment.

That, that, that's what I suggested upthread?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2020-03-13 07:13:02 Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals
Previous Message imai.yoshikazu@fujitsu.com 2020-03-13 06:54:28 RE: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)